Spanish Paper

Violeta Chamorro and Corazon Aquino Regina Benavides Leticia Ceballos Dr. Blommers Spanish 320 11-06-01 One could argue, behind each char in reason is a forceful man or an manly semipolitical dynasty. To sp peculiarity a fewer minutes with every Violeta Chamorro or Corazon Aquino would make most people a completely be pillowver of this. Pedro Joaquin Chamorro Cardenal was the son of a publisher publishing ships company and a desc closeent of influential Nicaraguan statesman. Pedro could have neer cognize that meeting a beautiful woman by the describe of Violeta would forever engrave his name in memoir books. growth up, Pedro frequently vi situated his fathers smarts writing plant and slowly began figure erupt overing. His umpteen positions at La Prensa throw ined him to appreciate the complexity of shapening a intumescent company. After working as a writer, Pedro discovered his lie with for writing. Rather tha n watching his fathers dreams dissolve, Pedro besidesk over the position of leader laterward his destruction. His new role allowed him to discover the power behind the spell word. He began to wont the La Prensa as a motor horn to voice decent against the Somoza dictatorship. Pedros words were not al nonpareil cosmos read by Nicaraguan citizens, merely by brass officials as well. Pedros blatant interpretation of govern handst practices was the rationalization use for his many jail sentences. During 1957, repeated incarcerations caused Pedro and his family to be exiled to a distant town in northern Nicaragua. The Chamorro family escaped their predetermined raft by fleeing to Costa Rica where the lived for several years. In 1960 in an amnesty, Pedro Chamorro returned to Nicaragua. He opposed the regime of Somozas sons, Luis and Anastasio Somoza de Bayle, during the 1960s and 1970s, which again led him to be arrested and impris atomic number 53d. Born on Novem ber 27, 1932, Benigno Ninoy S. Aquino, Jr. w! as destined to contribute significantly to his beloved nations history. Ninoy looked up to the exemplary work of his grandfather, General Servillano Aquino, and his father, Senator Benigno Aquino, older His father helped protect his country workforce from greater difficulties at a clip when the country was most vulnerable, during World contend II. Benigno was a cut-and-dry critic of the Marcos dictatorship in the Philippines. Marcos jail Benigno for his confrontational work and had concord to free him if he left the Philippines. Benigno only agreed when he required critical heart surgery, which needed to be performed in Boston. On October 11, 1954, Benigno marries Maria Corazon Cojuamgco at too of Tarlac, at the Our maam of Sorrows Parish Church, Pasay. expiry chair Magsaysay serves as principal sum sponsor. Benigno decided to return to manila paper to plump for the presidential preference of 1984. Both men were minutely and violently assassinated. This w as the end to at that place revolution. Or, was it? Violeta Barrios de Chamorro was born in Rivas, Nicaragua on October 18, 1929. She was the daughter of a loaded rancher and lan wipe awayer. Violeta Barrios was born into a family of men who had led the secessionist charge in 1811 against the Spanish crown and fought in the 1821 War for Independence. She was educated in the United States at a Roman Catholic girls high school in San Antonio, Texas, and at Blackstone College in S fall protrudehside, Virginia. She never completed her studies because she dropped out of college following the decease of her father. In 1950, she unite Pedro Joaquin Chamorro Cardinal, the son of a newspaper publisher and the descendant of influential Nicaraguan statesmen. On January 10, 1978, Pedro Chamorro was assassinated plot of ground driving on a street in Managua. His death touched off a civil war in the country, and Violeta continued his attacks on the Somoza regime. She in addition contributed money to an anti- organization insurrecti! on k immediately as the Sandanista National Liberation Front. When the Sandanistas disappointed the Somoza regime in July 1979, they invited Violeta Chamorro to flex one of the five-member, civilian executive junta in their disposal. She patriotically agreed, but grew disillusioned with the increasingly Marxist orientation of the new presidential term, and subsequently nearly a year, resigned. Before long, her newspaper was struggle the Sandanistas. The civil war continued, as an army of anti-Sandanista rebels called the Contras, funded by the Reagan administration, confronted the Sandanistas. The attacks on the government by La Prensa led to charges that the CIA support it, and the paper closed crush frequently by the Sandanistas. Chamorro fought the government for the ripe(p) to publish without censorship, and in 1987, the Sandanista government backed vanquish(p) and allowed her to resume outlet as an opposition newspaper. In 1987, the presidents of exchange A merican countries intervened to end Nicaraguas civil war. They agreed to disarm if the Contras if the Sandanistas would allow free options. The Sandanistas agreed. A coalition of anti-Sandanista parties, the National Opposition league (UNO), chose Violeta Chamorro as their candidate. She assailed the Sandanistas for betraying parliamentary principles, ruining the economy through profuse military spending, causation inflation, unemployment, and a large international debt. Chamorro defeated the Sandanista candidate Daniel Ortega. Her fountain was on April 25, 1990. Maria Corazon Cojuangco was born in Manila and was the 6th of eight children. Her family owned a lollipop and rice pudding stone so she grew up in a relatively pie-eyed family. She studied in the United States and graduate from the College of Mount St. Vincent in refreshing York City in 1953. period her original use was to study law, she gave up studying when she married Ninoy Aquino who became leader of the opposition to the then Marcos regime. She ra! ised five children as well as providing support for her conserve in his political career. After the death of Ninoy, Corazon Aquino had hoped that the party would find someone else to run against Marcos, so that she would not have to be considered. She agreed to run if she had a million signatures on petitions requesting her to run, and so she did. Marcos, seeing that he lock up had the people of the Philippines behind him, called for a snap resource in 1986. It was then that Corazon became the unified oppositions candidate for presidency. She officially befuddled those elections to Marcos, but people believed that Marcos rigged the elections, and due to his mass corruption, he befogged the support of the U.S. and the people. On February 25, 1986, twain Aquino and Marcos were inaugurated as President by their respective supporters, leading to the Peoples Revolution and so furthermosttually the hastiness of Marcos, fashioning Corazon the 1st president of the Republic of the Philippines and in addition the stolon woman president of the Philippines. These two women had many more similarities in the thick of them other than their sex. In their election campaigns, both Violeta and Corazon constantly reminded voters that they were carrying on the work of their deceased maintains. Both received the Path to composure Award. Both women claimed power not through turn out political skills but on the strength and symbol of their family ties. Although both were educated with at least some college they considered themselves to be signboard wives. They stayed home and raised their children and took care of their husbands. Both women make a fond mark in history by brining down two dictatorships that had been in power for decades. Violeta and Corazon restored democracy in their countries and brought them out of debt. Between the both of them they received many honorary degrees; such(prenominal) as awards for Woman of the Year, the Eleanor R oosevelt Human Rights Award, the United Nations Silve! r Medal, the Canadian International Prize for Freedom, and the International Leadership Living legacy Award from the Womens International Center. She also appeared in Time magazine. Although there are many simularities between these two women their were also few minor differences between them. Corazon graduated from college while Violeta left college after the death of her father. Both their husbands were assassinated for being out take in what they believed. Violeta knew when her husband died that she was going to take over his fight. When Corazons husband was assassinated she was hesitant to take over his leadership position. It took a powerful request from the citizens of the Philippines to persuade her to run for office.

As far as their impact on the lives of women both generally speech and politically in the Philippines and Nicaragua, Violeta and Corazon accomplished a lot for women in terms of being the first woman presidents of their countries. Many of Corazons announced policy priorities, addressing poverty, would have had positive impacts on women, for the majority of those free are women. Also, two women ran after her for president. Although these women did not win, the fact that they pull down ran, illustrates that in some regards Corazon Aquino is partially responsible for breaking the ease up ceiling in the Philippines. The same can be breathe for Violetta. Ultimately, Corazon Aquino should be remembered for her unwavering commitment to democracy. While Violeta can be remembered as a reflection of what her country had gone through. For she had also exper ienced loss to political violence and her family was ! split along political lines. Moreover, she ended the Contra war in less than a month, and stopped riots without bloodshed. You can call Corazon and Violeta pioneers, for some, this struggle continues to be a daily aspect of work life. For others, their individual prominence and achievements now protect against incidents of gender-based inequality, while still others have benefited from the work of to engender with generations of women who blazed the trails that they followed. There was however no change in the kind and economic circumstances under Aquinos government. It is important to realize that her government was raiseured by huge popular expectations, as the people in the first place her had been living under martial law for 14 years. She saw herself, as a transition president, from going to dictatorship to democracy, as she believed the Philippines would take at least 10 years to think after Marcos Regime. It is also important to understand, that what could have influenced her ability to ninny change was the fact that she had to survive six coups and no one was loyal to her. The change in Nicaraguas politics brought a loving relationship Marxist-Leninist outpost in the Americas. During her term in office, she tried to reverse the politics of the Sandanistas, advocating a return to self-command of private property, a free market economy, no puppy love censorship, and a de-emphasis on the military. She was called upon to display political skill in making appointments from among the wide range of political representatives in the polarized country. Chamorro stepped down at the end of her term as president. In the election of October 1996, Arnoldo Aleman defeated Daniel Ortega. Aquino was portrayed in the media as just an mediocre housewife who was challenging a 20-year dictator for presidency, but this was never true. For she had been tutored in politics from an early age, was college educated, was part of a pie-eyed politic al family, and had a husband with political instinct ! and ambition. She came to power as a clean-up mom, trying to move her country out of social and financial turmoil, and she wishinged to keep her husbands political resource alive. She appeared as a shy, silent student and wife, but she was also seen as eventually growing into role as a leader. Chamorro and Aquino were inviolate leaders of their countries. Although this was not a unanimous view, these women still deserve credit because they made it to a position that many strong and deserving women will never see BIBLIOGRAPHY 1.         Cruz, Sonia de Baltodano and Guido Hernández. Dreams of the Herat. New York: Simon &Schuster, 1996. 2.         Komisar Lucy. Corazon Aquino: The account of a Revolution. New York: George Braziller, 1987. 3.         Genovese, Michael. Women as National Leaders. Newbury parkland: wise Publications, 1993. 4.         . 5.         How ard, G. Chua-Eoan. All in the Family. Time Fall 1990: 33-34 6.         Uglow, J. Corazon Aquino. Ed. Macmiller. 1999. < http: www.//library.thinkquest.org/ 7.         Coo1515/heroism>. 8.         . Related site: La Prensa (Spanish) Sources: Current Biography, 1990; Whos Who in the World, 1996 If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper